Orchestrator / PRODUCT DOSSIER

Conductor

Coordinate a team of coding agents in cloud workspaces.

Official website ↗Explore in graph →11 cited claims ↓

Desktop & cloud · Not established · Platform license not establishedRevision 2026-09-13.4 · unreviewedNeeds recheck · recheck 2026-10-130 attestations · checked 2026-09-13

What we do not know yet · 2 open gaps

Compare cloud sandbox isolation with local worktree isolation.
Test shared workspace permissions and simultaneous edits.

Applies to: Unpinned public documentation as of 2026-09-13 · Documentation review only

Applicability, 3 recheck triggers & verification plan

Applicability

Unpinned public documentation as of 2026-09-13

Documentation review only

Excludes: Runtime behavior; Performance comparisons; Security guarantees

Recheck when

Documentation changes
New product release
License change

Needs recheck · due 2026-10-13

Verification plan

Pin a product release or repository commit and record the host environment.
Create a disposable repository with a passing baseline test.
Run a bounded change with two agents where supported; record permissions and logs.
Record a failed attempt, actual outcome, and artifacts without secrets.
Have another person reproduce the result before labeling it reproduced.

Provenance & review

Testedknowhow initial research

Commissioned by a Nimbalyst maintainer; not an independent comparison.

Revision 2026-09-13.4 · unreviewed · checked 2026-09-13

0 attestations · Content: Unlicensed prototype; redistribution decision pending

Capability claims · 11 / 46 sourced

Standing condition: these are documentation claims at the source capture date, with outcome “claimed”; no runtime execution is recorded. Dossier applicability and limitations apply throughout. Expand a row for its statement, specific scope and contradictions. Numbered citations resolve to the source locator and capture date below. Missing evidence means Unknown, not No. Sources are unpinned unless marked “Pinned”; this marks source stability, not stronger support or runtime verification. Reuse counts refer to claims in the full dossier; repeated citations do not represent independent sources.

Yes Documented within scope Partial Limited form of the feature No Explicit evidence of absence Unknown No evidence recorded. These are support assessments, not quality scores or runtime verification.

Orchestration

Parallel agentsYes

Explore Parallel agents →

Runs a team of coding agents.

[1]

Git worktreesYes

Explore Git worktrees →

Creates a Git worktree and branch per workspace.

[3]

Agent choiceYes

Explore Agent choice →

Uses first-party Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode agents.

[1]

Review & delivery

Change reviewYes

Explore Change review →

Reviews workspace diffs before merging.

[2]

Git operationsYes

Explore Git operations →

Manages workspace branches and merges.

[2]

Pull request workflowYes

Explore Pull request workflow →

Opens pull requests from completed work.

[2]

Work surface

Terminal accessYes

Explore Terminal access →

Each workspace includes its own terminal.

[2]

Context & models

MCP toolsYes

Explore MCP tools →

Supports requests to configured MCP services.

[5]

Execution & access

Remote executionYes

Explore Remote execution →

Runs cloud agents in isolated microVM sandboxes.

[1]

Team collaborationYes

Explore Team collaboration →

Cloud organization members share live chats and workspaces.

[4]

Tool permissionsYes

Explore Tool permissions →

Delegates tool permissions to configured agent harnesses.

[5]

Interface images & local attachments

Screenshots & attachments

Image index

Official project screenshots and your own reference images. Images illustrate a UI; they do not verify feature behavior. Uploads stay in this browser.

No screenshots gathered yet.